Timlin v. Schepps

242 A.D. 705

This text of 242 A.D. 705 (Timlin v. Schepps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timlin v. Schepps, 242 A.D. 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the trial court, by numerous inquiries of the witnesses, the prejudicial tenor of them, coupled with many prejudicial comments, and the unfair nature of his charge, deprived plaintiff of a fair trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timlin-v-schepps-nyappdiv-1934.