Timlin v. Schepps
242 A.D. 705
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the trial court, by numerous inquiries of the witnesses, the prejudicial tenor of them, coupled with many prejudicial comments, and the unfair nature of his charge, deprived plaintiff of a fair trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timlin v. Schepps, 242 A.D. 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 705 (Timlin v. Schepps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.