Timlin v. Schepps
244 A.D. 804
Opinion
Order setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial reversed on the facts, with costs, the verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs, on the ground that the evidence fails to disclose any sufficient reason justifying the order. (Dashnau v. City of Oswego, 204 App. Div. 189.) Young, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timlin v. Schepps, 244 A.D. 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
244 A.D. 804 (Timlin v. Schepps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dashnau v. City of Oswego
204 A.D. 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)