Timlin v. Schepps
This text of 244 A.D. 804 (Timlin v. Schepps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial reversed on the facts, with costs, the verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs, on the ground that the evidence fails to disclose any sufficient reason justifying the order. (Dashnau v. City of Oswego, 204 App. Div. 189.) Young, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timlin-v-schepps-nyappdiv-1935.