Timken Co. v. United States

1999 CIT 9
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Timken Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 F. Supp. 2d 1102
United States Court of International Trade·Decided January 22, 1999·No. 97-04-00562·Published

Opinion

Slip 0p. 99- 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

THE TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v.

Court No. UNITED STATES, 97-04-O0562 Defendant,

KOYO SEIKO CO., LTD., and, KOYO CORPORATION OF U.S.A.

Defendant-Intervenors,

JUDGMENT

This C0urt, having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration's (Commerce) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, The Timken CompanV v. United States, Slip Op. 98-92, Julv 21 1998, Court No. 97-04-O0562 ("Remand Results") filed September 29, 1998, and upon finding that Commerce complied with the Court's remand order, and no comments to the Remand Results having been received, hereby

ORDERS that the Remand Results are affirmed in their entirety; and further

ORDERS that, all other issues having been decided, this case is dismissed.

// NICHOLA TSOU LAS Dated: January 22, 1998 SENIO JUDG

New York, New York

ERRATUM

Slip Op. 99-9 The Timken Company v. United States Court No. 97-04-00562

The Judgment should be dated january 22, 1999 not January 22, 1998.

February 1, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timken Co. v. United States, 1999 CIT 9 (cit 1999).

1999 CIT 9 (Timken Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corus Staal BV v. United States
502 F.3d 1370 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
Ugine and Alz Belgium v. United States
452 F.3d 1289 (Federal Circuit, 2006)