Timken Co. v. United States

20 Ct. Int'l Trade 537
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedApril 19, 1996
DocketCourt No. 92-03-00161
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 537 (Timken Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timken Co. v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 537 (cit 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

Tsoucalas, Judge:

In accordance with the February 29, 1996, decision and mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”), Appeal No. 95-1305, remanding this case with instructions, it is

Ordered that the judgment of this Court in Timken Co. v. United States, 19 CIT 272, Slip Op. 95-20 (Feb. 10, 1995), to the extent that it affirmed the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, The Timken Company v. United States, Slip Op. 94-141 (September 14, 1994), in which Commerce adjusted for Japan’s value added tax (“VAT”) by adding to United States price the result of multiplying Japan’s tax rate by the price of the United States merchandise calculated at the same point in the stream of commerce as where the Japanese VAT is applied for home market sales, is vacated; and it is further

Ordered that Commerce is to recalculate the dumping margins for Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. using a tax-neutral VAT adjustment methodology which utilizes the amount of foreign tax, rather than the tax rate; and it is further

Ordered that Commerce will report the results of this remand to the Court within sixty (60) days of the entry of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timken-co-v-united-states-cit-1996.