Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission, Association of America's Public Television Stations, Intervenors

105 F.3d 723, 323 U.S. App. D.C. 109, 6 Communications Reg. (P&F) 495, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2016
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 7, 1997·No. 93-1266, 93-1384, 93-5349, 93-5350 and 93-5351·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

[724] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Suggestions for Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taMng of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestions. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the suggestions be denied.

Circuit Judges WALD and HENDERSON did not participate in this matter. A dissenting statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS, with whom Chief Judge EDWARDS, and Circuit Judges SILBERMAN, GINSBURG and SENTELLE concur, is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission, Association of America's Public Television Stations, Intervenors, 105 F.3d 723, 323 U.S. App. D.C. 109, 6 Communications Reg. (P&F) 495, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2016 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

105 F.3d 723 (Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission, Association of America's Public Television Stations, Intervenors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related