Home/New York Court of Appeals/Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

191 N.E. 495, 264 N.Y. 421, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 N.Y. 467 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 191 N.E. 495, 264 N.Y. 421, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1464 (N.Y. 1934).

191 N.E. 495 (Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.