Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

191 N.E. 618, 264 N.Y. 670, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1703

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 N.Y. 467 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1934·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 264 N. Y. 467.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 191 N.E. 618, 264 N.Y. 670, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1703 (N.Y. 1934).

Pincite

191 N.E. 618 (Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

191 N.E. 518 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)