Tidwell v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.

278 S.W. 1115
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error refused. We do not agree that appellee should be denied 'the right to recover, if he was injured as the proximate result of negligence of appellant in failing to exercise ordinary care to keep a lookout, unless appellee was guilty of contributory negligence. The case must be remanded for a new trial under the conclusions of the Court of Civil Appeals as to insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict for appellee, and we therefore refused the application for writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tidwell v. Houston & T. C. R. Co., 278 S.W. 1115 (Tex. 1924).

278 S.W. 1115 (Tidwell v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henwood v. Bennett
154 S.W.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)