Tidwell v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.

262 S.W. 810, 114 Tex. 582
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 29, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 262 S.W. 810 (Tidwell v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tidwell v. Houston & T. C. R. Co., 262 S.W. 810, 114 Tex. 582 (Tex. 1924).

Opinion

Note by Court: “We do not agree that appellee should be denied the right to recover if he was injured as the proximate result of negligence of appellant in failing to exercise ordinary care to keep a lookout, unless appellee was guilty of contributory negligence. The case must be remanded for a new trial under the conclusions of the Court of Civil. Appeals as to insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict for appellee, and we therefore refused the application for writ of error.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henwood v. Bennett
154 S.W.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Daft
120 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Row, Peterson Co. v. Marrs
273 S.W. 795 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 S.W. 810, 114 Tex. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidwell-v-houston-t-c-r-co-tex-1924.