Tidwell v. 2 Majors/Lieutenants

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedNovember 5, 2021
Docket3:21-cv-01377
StatusUnknown

This text of Tidwell v. 2 Majors/Lieutenants (Tidwell v. 2 Majors/Lieutenants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tidwell v. 2 Majors/Lieutenants, (S.D. Ill. 2021).

Opinion

CLEOTHER TIDWELL, #N41754, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil No. 21-cv-1377-DWD ) 2 MAJORS/LIEUTENANTS, and ) 7 CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DUGAN, District Judge: Plaintiff Cleother Tidwell, an inmate of the Illinois Department of Corrections who is currently incarcerated at Menard Correctional Center (“Menard”), brings this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for constitutional deprivations that occurred at Menard. (Doc. 1). Tidwell claims that a corrections officer called him a racist name. He originally filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on October 21, 2021. See Tidwell v. 2 Majors/Lieutenants, No. 1:21-cv- 5634. Because venue was improper, the action was transferred to this federal judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) on November 3, 2021. (Doc. 3). This matter is now before the Court for case management. Plaintiff is a restricted filer in this District, and this Court would not have allowed him to file the instant Complaint here. See Tidwell v. Menard C.C., No. 16-cv-00384-SMY- RJD (Doc. 43). The subject filing ban was imposed on August 10, 2017: Cleother Tidwell is SANCTIONED with a $500 fine, to be paid before any other civil litigation will be filed. This fine is in addition to any other filing fees owed to this District. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return all civil pleadings unfiled until the sanction is paid, and all habeas corpus are excluded from the sanction.

(Doc. 43, p. 7). The filing ban remains in place.1 Pursuant to that ban, the Clerk of Court will return unfiled any civil pleadings that Plaintiff attempts to file in this District. Plaintiff’s decision to file his Complaint in the Northern District of Illinois was not even arguably proper, as none of the facts or parties have the slightest connection to that jurisdiction. Instead, this represents the latest in a long line of attempts to avoid the filing restriction here despite repeated warnings. He has attempted this on at least six (6) prior occasions. See Tidwell v. Kink, No. 18-cv-00959-DRH (Western District of Louisiana); Tidwell v. John/Jane Does, No. 18-cv-01181-NJR (Northern District of New York); Tidwell v.

Kink, No. 18-cv-01691-MJR (Southern District of West Virginia); Tidwell v. Cunningham, No. 18-cv-01448-SMY (Northern District of Texas); Tidwell v. Dunlap, No. 18-cv-02008- NJR (Southern District of West Virginia); and Tidwell v. Hopkins, No. 19-cv-239-NJR (Eastern District of Tennessee). Plaintiff’s filing ban has been extended, and on several occasions he has been sanctioned in $500 increments.

Like those before it, this case also shall be administratively closed. To further deter Tidwell from similar misconduct, this Court will impose an additional $1000 sanction. Tidwell stands WARNED that further attempts to avoid the filing ban now in effect in this District shall result in increasingly harsh sanctions that include, but are not limited to, monetary fines.

1 Despite the filing ban that is currently in effect in this District, the Clerk of Court correctly opened this case because a judge in the transferor district signed an order transferring it to this District. Hall v. Stone, 170 F.3d 706, 708 (7th Cir. 1999) (“Even an invalid judicial order must be obeyed until it is stayed or set aside on appeal.”). Disposition The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATEVLY CLOSE this

case. No filing fee shall be assessed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Cleother Tidwell is SANCTIONED with an additional $1000 fine, to be paid before any other civil litigation will be filed. This fine is in addition to any other filing fees and/or sanctions owed to this Court. Tidwell is WARNED that future efforts to evade the filing ban shall result in the imposition of additional monetary and/or other sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 5, 2021

DavidW.Dugan United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph N. Hall v. Dennis Stone
170 F.3d 706 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tidwell v. 2 Majors/Lieutenants, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tidwell-v-2-majorslieutenants-ilsd-2021.