Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin

284 A.2d 179, 59 N.J. 506

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedDecember 6, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 284 A.2d 179 (Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Franklin, 284 A.2d 179, 59 N.J. 506 (N.J. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

59 N.J. 506 (1971) 284 A.2d 179

TANYA TIBBS, INFANT, BY HER GUARDIANS, MR. AND MRS. HAROLD DIGGS, NELLIE HARRELL, INFANT, BY HER GUARDIANS, MR. AND MRS. SAMUEL SPURGEON, GENSEY LAWRENCE, INFANT, BY HER GUARDIANS, MR. AND MRS. NORRIS LAWRENCE, DENISE AVERETTE, INFANT, BY HER GUARDIANS, MR. AND MRS. WILLIE AVERETTE, AND OTHERS SIMILARLY AFFECTED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN (SOMERSET COUNTY), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 8, 1971. Argued November 22, 1971. Decided December 6, 1971.

*507 Mr. Leonard N. Arnold argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. William J. Zaino, Somerset County Legal Services, argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. James B. Ventantonio, Director; Messrs. Michael D. Lang, William J. Zaino and Joseph Lipofsky, Somerset County Legal Services, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky. (114 N.J. Super. 287)

For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN 7.

For reversal None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI