Thurston v. State

812 So. 2d 516, 2002 WL 429287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 2002·No. 4D02-558·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

812 So.2d 516 (2002)

John Edward THURSTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D02-558.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 2002.

*517 John Edward Thurston, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, who apparently has a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief pending, has taken an appeal from an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in post-conviction proceedings. This order is not appealable under rule 9.140. We therefore dismiss the appeal without prejudice to appellant raising the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel in an appeal from an order denying his rule 3.850 motion in the event that his motion is denied.

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurston v. State, 812 So. 2d 516, 2002 WL 429287 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

812 So. 2d 516 (Thurston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horton v. State
39 So. 3d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
GIRLEY v. State
933 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Mitchell v. State
919 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)