Thurston v. State
847 So. 2d 1053, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8271, 2003 WL 21276007
This text of 847 So. 2d 1053 (Thurston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thurston v. State, 847 So. 2d 1053, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8271, 2003 WL 21276007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice. See Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Finley v. State, 394 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)(“[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leichtman v. Singletary
674 So. 2d 889 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Finley v. State
394 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 1053, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8271, 2003 WL 21276007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurston-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.