Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thurston v. State

Thurston v. State

847 So. 2d 1053, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8271, 2003 WL 21276007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 2003·No. No. 4D02-565·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice. See Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Finley v. State, 394 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)(“[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P.”).

STONE, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurston v. State, 847 So. 2d 1053, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8271, 2003 WL 21276007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

847 So. 2d 1053 (Thurston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leichtman v. Singletary
674 So. 2d 889 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Finley v. State
394 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)