Thumbtzen v. Deese

Supreme Court of Florida

Thumbtzen v. Deese

216 So. 2d 748

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 18, 1968·No. No. 37194·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and HOPPING, JJ., concur.

Thumbtzen v. Deese, 216 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

216 So. 2d 748 (Thumbtzen v. Deese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related