Investment Corporation of Florida v. Buchman
Opinion
INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, a Florida Corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Ralph J. BUCHMAN, Leonard M. Anton, and Robert A. McCormick, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
James E. Thompson, of Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, for petitioner.
Thomas C. MacDonald Jr., and Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
Opinion below, 208 So.2d 291.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
216 So. 2d 748 (Investment Corporation of Florida v. Buchman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.