Thorup v. Thorup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thorup v. Thorup

49 A.D.2d 855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 855 (Thorup v. Thorup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thorup v. Thorup, 49 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 3, 1975, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing to $200 per week the amount that defendant shall pay for plaintiff’s and the children’s support and mainte[856]*856nance and by allocating $150 of that sum for the support of the infant children and $50 thereof as alimony for the wife (see Commissioner v Lester, 366 US 299) and by reducing to $1,500, in accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the additional counsel fee awarded to plaintiff. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record does not justify the award of permanent alimony and support and maintenance made at trial term and we consider it excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 3, 1975, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing to $200 per week the amount that defendant shall pay for plaintiff’s and the children’s support and mainte[856]*856nance and by allocating $150 of that sum for the support of the infant children and $50 thereof as alimony for the wife (see Commissioner v Lester, 366 US 299) and by reducing to $1,500, in accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the additional counsel fee awarded to plaintiff. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record does not justify the award of permanent alimony and support and maintenance made at trial term and we consider it excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorup-v-thorup-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack