Thornton v. Manchester Investment Co.
22 S.E. 987, 97 Ga. 342
Opinion
This court will not entertain a writ of error sued out to a judgment refusing to enjoin a sale of land, when it appears from an affidavit of counsel for defendant in error, not denied by counsel for plaintiff in error, that no supersedeas of the judgment below was obtained, and that the sale sought to be enjoined has actually taken place. See Atlanta & Florida R. R. Co. v. Blanton, 80 Ga. 563. Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thornton v. Manchester Investment Co., 22 S.E. 987, 97 Ga. 342 (Ga. 1895).
22 S.E. 987 (Thornton v. Manchester Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fountain v. Grant
84 S.E.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. County Court of Mingo County
15 S.E.2d 574 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1941)
Phillips v. Tyre
158 S.E. 6 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Kitchens v. State
61 S.E. 736 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Marietta Chair Co. v. Henderson
45 S.E. 725 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Tuells v. Torras
39 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
In re Kaeppler
75 N.W. 253 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1898)
Henderson v. Hoppe
30 S.E. 653 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Corning & Co. v. Siesel & Wolf Co.
28 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)