Thorill v. Hills
246 A.D. 543
Opinion
In an action against a physician for malpractice, order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination modified by striking out items 1 and 6 and by striking out the word “ negligently ” in items 3, 4 and 5, and the words “ ignorantly and negligently ” in item 7, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 536.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thorill v. Hills, 246 A.D. 543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
246 A.D. 543 (Thorill v. Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.