Thorill v. Hills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thorill v. Hills

246 A.D. 543

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 543 (Thorill v. Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thorill v. Hills, 246 A.D. 543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action against a physician for malpractice, order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination modified by striking out items 1 and 6 and by striking out the word “ negligently ” in items 3, 4 and 5, and the words “ ignorantly and negligently ” in item 7, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 536.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action against a physician for malpractice, order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination modified by striking out items 1 and 6 and by striking out the word “ negligently ” in items 3, 4 and 5, and the words “ ignorantly and negligently ” in item 7, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 536.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorill-v-hills-nyappdiv-1935.