Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.

Supreme Court

Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.

413 U.S. 903, 93 S. Ct. 3028, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1014, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1935

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 25, 1973

DocketNo. 70-23; No. 70-30

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 413 U.S. 903 (Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., 413 U.S. 903, 93 S. Ct. 3028, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1014, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1935 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from D. C. W. D. Ark. [904]*904Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgment in No. 70-23. He would reverse the judgment in No. 70-30. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand cases for further consideration in light of Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U. S. 225 (1972).

Reported below: 316 F. Supp. 815.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from D. C. W. D. Ark. [904]*904Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgment in No. 70-23. He would reverse the judgment in No. 70-30. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand cases for further consideration in light of Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U. S. 225 (1972).

Reported below: 316 F. Supp. 815.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 U.S. 903, 93 S. Ct. 3028, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1014, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-united-artists-theatre-circuit-inc-scotus-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack