Thompson v. Thompson

658 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9155, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 1995·No. No. 94-2713·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects except one. It appears from the judgment that the court intended to equalize the equitable distribution of the parties’ property when it awarded the wife lump sum alimony. The amount awarded, however, according to the figures used by the court, makes the equitable distribution unequal. If the court had awarded one-half the amount of lump sum alimony that it did award, the equitable distribution would have been equal. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to reduce by one-half the amount of lump sum alimony or to make findings justifying an unequal distribution in favor of the wife.

Reversed and remanded.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Thompson, 658 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9155, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 1254 (Thompson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.