Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thompson v. Thompson

Thompson v. Thompson

624 So. 2d 863, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10096, 1993 WL 393660
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 So. 2d 436 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1993·No. No. 92-2831·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Our decision is without prejudice to appellant to apply to the trial court for modification of the term of rehabilitative alimony, if appropriate. See Saez-Ortiz v. Saez-Ortiz, 560 So.2d 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); O’Neal v. O’Neal, 410 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Thompson, 624 So. 2d 863, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10096, 1993 WL 393660 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

624 So. 2d 863 (Thompson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Wright
431 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
O'Neal v. O'Neal
410 So. 2d 1369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Saez-Ortiz v. Saez-Ortiz
560 So. 2d 1375 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)