Thompson v. Thompson
624 So. 2d 863, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10096, 1993 WL 393660
This text of 624 So. 2d 863 (Thompson v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thompson v. Thompson, 624 So. 2d 863, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10096, 1993 WL 393660 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Our decision is without prejudice to appellant to apply to the trial court for modification of the term of rehabilitative alimony, if appropriate. See Saez-Ortiz v. Saez-Ortiz, 560 So.2d 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); O’Neal v. O’Neal, 410 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wright v. Wright
431 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
O'Neal v. O'Neal
410 So. 2d 1369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Saez-Ortiz v. Saez-Ortiz
560 So. 2d 1375 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 863, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10096, 1993 WL 393660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-thompson-fladistctapp-1993.