Thompson v. Texas Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Thompson v. Texas Co.

143 S.E. 376, 166 Ga. 315, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 298

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 16, 1928

DocketNo. 6126

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 143 S.E. 376 (Thompson v. Texas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Texas Co., 143 S.E. 376, 166 Ga. 315, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 298 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

• Hnx, J.

1. A filling-station is not per se a nuisance. 2. The allegations of the petition do not show that the filling-station which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from erecting will be so erected or operated as to make the same a nuisance.

3. The court below did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition as amended. Standard Oil Co. v. Kahn, 165 Ga. 575 (141 S. E. 643), and cit. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concw. W. N. Oliver, for plaintiff. Slaion & Hopkins, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

• Hnx, J.

1. A filling-station is not per se a nuisance. 2. The allegations of the petition do not show that the filling-station which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from erecting will be so erected or operated as to make the same a nuisance.

3. The court below did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition as amended. Standard Oil Co. v. Kahn, 165 Ga. 575 (141 S. E. 643), and cit. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concw. W. N. Oliver, for plaintiff. Slaion & Hopkins, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E. 376, 166 Ga. 315, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-texas-co-ga-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack