Bush v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bush v. Sheffield

151 S.E. 811, 169 Ga. 850, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 50

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 11, 1930·No. No. 7154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following the rulings in Coker v. Birge, 9 Ga. 425 (54 Am. D. 347), and cit., and 10 Ga. 335, the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition and in granting an interlocutory injunction. The following cases differ in their facts, and are not in conflict: Standard Oil Co. v. Kahn, 105 Ga. 575 (141 S. E. 643) ; Thompson v. Texas Co., 106 Ga. 315 (143 S. E. 376) ; Barton v. Rogers, 166 Ga. 802 (144 S. E. 248).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Drake and P. Z. Geer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Following the rulings in Coker v. Birge, 9 Ga. 425 (54 Am. D. 347), and cit., and 10 Ga. 335, the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition and in granting an interlocutory injunction. The following cases differ in their facts, and are not in conflict: Standard Oil Co. v. Kahn, 105 Ga. 575 (141 S. E. 643) ; Thompson v. Texas Co., 106 Ga. 315 (143 S. E. 376) ; Barton v. Rogers, 166 Ga. 802 (144 S. E. 248).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Drake and P. Z. Geer, contra.

Bush v. Sheffield, 151 S.E. 811, 169 Ga. 850, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 50 (Ga. 1930).

Pincite

151 S.E. 811 (Bush v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related