Thompson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Thompson v. State

1914 OK CR 94, 140 P. 435, 10 Okla. Crim. 694, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 185

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 25, 1914

DocketNo. A-2094.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 94 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 1914 OK CR 94, 140 P. 435, 10 Okla. Crim. 694, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 185 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Phineas S. Thompson, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of McIntosh county of a violation of the prohibition law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was, on the 25th day of July, 1913, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of thirty days and to pay a fine of seventy-five dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was attempted t® be taken by. filing in this court on September 24, 1913, a petition in error with case-made. On October '2, 1913, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not filed 'in this court within sixty days from the rendition of the judgment. It appearing from the record that the statutory time had not been extended by order of the court, and it appearing further that the appeal was lodged in this court one day too late, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Phineas S. Thompson, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of McIntosh county of a violation of the prohibition law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was, on the 25th day of July, 1913, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of thirty days and to pay a fine of seventy-five dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was attempted t® be taken by. filing in this court on September 24, 1913, a petition in error with case-made. On October '2, 1913, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not filed 'in this court within sixty days from the rendition of the judgment. It appearing from the record that the statutory time had not been extended by order of the court, and it appearing further that the appeal was lodged in this court one day too late, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 94, 140 P. 435, 10 Okla. Crim. 694, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.