Thompson v. State

1912 OK CR 413, 127 P. 872, 8 Okla. Crim. 393, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 Okla. Crim. 50
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 30, 1912·No. No. A-1566.·Published

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

On the 7th day of October, 1911, judg-’ ment was rendered in the county court of Osage county against *394 appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail, from which judgment the appellant prosecuted and perfected an appeal.

It has been made to appear to the satisfaction of this court that since perfecting this appeal, appellant has fled beyond the bounds of this state, and is now not within the jurisdiction of this court, but is a fugitive from justice, so that any judgment rendei'ed by the court could not be enforced against him. Under the repeated decisioxrs of this court, such flight constitutes an abandonment of the appeal, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

DOYLE, J., concui's; ARMSTRONG, J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 1912 OK CR 413, 127 P. 872, 8 Okla. Crim. 393, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 415 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

1912 OK CR 413 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.