Thompson v. State

359 S.W.3d 507, 2012 WL 265924, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 122
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2012·No. WD 73389·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Thompson pled guilty to first-degree robbery and was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. He thereafter filed a Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion, which was denied by the motion court without an evidentiary hearing. He now appeals that denial, raising two claims of error related to his sentencing. He claims that: (1) the sentencing assessment report misrepresented his acceptance of responsibility; and (2) counsel was ineffective when he failed to object to victim-impact testimony from family members of the victims on the theory that they were *508 precluded from testifying by section 557.041. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 359 S.W.3d 507, 2012 WL 265924, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

359 S.W.3d 507 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Creason
359 S.W.3d 507 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)