Thompson v. State
This text of 359 S.W.3d 507 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Timothy Thompson pled guilty to first-degree robbery and was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. He thereafter filed a Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion, which was denied by the motion court without an evidentiary hearing. He now appeals that denial, raising two claims of error related to his sentencing. He claims that: (1) the sentencing assessment report misrepresented his acceptance of responsibility; and (2) counsel was ineffective when he failed to object to victim-impact testimony from family members of the victims on the theory that they were *508 precluded from testifying by section 557.041. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 S.W.3d 507, 2012 WL 265924, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-moctapp-2012.