Thompson v. State
364 S.W.3d 807, 2012 WL 1392612, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 566
Opinion
Order
Roy Thompson appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends the motion court clearly erred by failing to enter specific findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding a claim raised in his pro se Rule 24.035 motion. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. State, 364 S.W.3d 807, 2012 WL 1392612, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 566 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
364 S.W.3d 807 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jones
364 S.W.3d 807 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)