Thompson v. State

110 S.E. 415, 27 Ga. App. 654, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 352

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 144 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1921·No. 12871·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The evidence, though weak as to one of the counts in the accusation, authorized the defendant’s conviction upon both counts.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching in its character, and not such as would likely produce a different result upon another trial, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. The evidence, though weak as to one of the counts in the accusation, authorized the defendant’s conviction upon both counts.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Thompson v. State, 110 S.E. 415, 27 Ga. App. 654, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 352 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

110 S.E. 415 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.