Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thompson v. State

103 S.E. 731, 25 Ga. App. 483, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 23

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1920·No. 11562·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. No exceptions pendente lite to the overruling of the demurrer were filed. The judgment on the demurrer was rendered on April 1, 1920, and the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge on May 1, 1920, more than 20 days after the overruling of the demurrer, and hence the assignment of error on that judgment was made too late and cannot be considered.

2. The evidence in this case authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the charge of the court, when read in its entirety, was full and fair and not subject to the criticisms urged in the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. No exceptions pendente lite to the overruling of the demurrer were filed. The judgment on the demurrer was rendered on April 1, 1920, and the bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge on May 1, 1920, more than 20 days after the overruling of the demurrer, and hence the assignment of error on that judgment was made too late and cannot be considered.

2. The evidence in this case authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the charge of the court, when read in its entirety, was full and fair and not subject to the criticisms urged in the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Thompson v. State, 103 S.E. 731, 25 Ga. App. 483, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 23 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

103 S.E. 731 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related