Thompson v. State
83 So. 3d 1002, 2012 WL 1034492, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3181 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the written order of revocation to specify the condition of probation appellant violated. The revocation order states that he violated all of the conditions alleged, but the record shows that the state had dropped two of the three charges. See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. State, 83 So. 3d 1002, 2012 WL 1034492, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
83 So. 3d 1002 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nickolas v. State
66 So. 3d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)