Thompson v. State

6 So. 3d 108, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2936, 2009 WL 838314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 965 So. 2d 1250
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 2009·No. 4D08-4696·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion, untimely filed in a criminal ease in which the conviction and sentence became final in 2000.

We note that one of appellant’s issues concerned whether his conviction in this case and in a 1999 case qualified him for *109 habitual felony offender sentencing in his subsequent 2005 case. This affirmance is without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.800(a) motion in his 2005 case, alleging, if he can, that the record in the 2005 case will demonstrate that the requisite convictions necessary to sentence him as a habitual felony offender do not exist. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1247 (Fla.2001).

FARMER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 6 So. 3d 108, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2936, 2009 WL 838314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

6 So. 3d 108 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)