Thompson v. State

648 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 317, 1995 WL 18388
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 615 So. 2d 737
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1995·No. No. 94-952·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant raises two issues on appeal — the denial of her motion to suppress and the imposition of a payment to First Step as a condition of probation. We find no merit in regard to the first issue, but strike the monetary assessment based upon our opinion in Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Accordingly, we strike that portion of the sentence. The conviction and sentence otherwise are AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 648 So. 2d 325, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 317, 1995 WL 18388 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

648 So. 2d 325 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tibero v. State
646 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)