Thompson v. Rabun
This text of 63 S.E. 215 (Thompson v. Rabun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where minors, by their next friend, brought an action wherein the defendant finally prevailed and obtained a judgment against such minors for costs expended by him pending such litigation, and where the minors, through their next friend, filed an equitable petition to enjoin a sale of their property under such judgment, and the only question submitted to the court upon the trial of the case was whether such judgment should have been rendered against such minors, or against their next friend; held:
{a) The judgment for costs should have been rendered against the next friend, who, upon the adverse termination of the case, was primarily liable for such costs, and the court committed no error in granting such injunction. Nance v. Stockburger, 112 Ga. 90 (37 S. E. 125, 81 Am. St. R. 22).
(&) Upon the trial of the ease the defendant offered to his plea an amendment which was not purely precatory in character, but averred new matter in defense, notice of which was not given in the original answer; and it not appearing that he made any affidavit that such new matter was not omitted from the original answer for the purpose of delay, the court committed no error in disallowing the proffered amendment. Gross v. Whitely, 128 Ga. 79 (57 S. E. 94).
Judgment affm-med.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E. 215, 131 Ga. 713, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-rabun-ga-1908.