Thompson v. Rabun

63 S.E. 215, 131 Ga. 713, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 189
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 19, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 S.E. 215 (Thompson v. Rabun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Rabun, 63 S.E. 215, 131 Ga. 713, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 189 (Ga. 1908).

Opinion

Holden, J.

Where minors, by their next friend, brought an action wherein the defendant finally prevailed and obtained a judgment against such minors for costs expended by him pending such litigation, and where the minors, through their next friend, filed an equitable petition to enjoin a sale of their property under such judgment, and the only question submitted to the court upon the trial of the case was whether such judgment should have been rendered against such minors, or against their next friend; held:

{a) The judgment for costs should have been rendered against the next friend, who, upon the adverse termination of the case, was primarily liable for such costs, and the court committed no error in granting such injunction. Nance v. Stockburger, 112 Ga. 90 (37 S. E. 125, 81 Am. St. R. 22).

Submitted May 26, Decided December 19, 1908. Equitable petition. Before Judge Worley. Glascock superior court. October 16, 1907. B. F. Walker, for plaintiff in error. I. 8. Peebles Jr., contra.

(&) Upon the trial of the ease the defendant offered to his plea an amendment which was not purely precatory in character, but averred new matter in defense, notice of which was not given in the original answer; and it not appearing that he made any affidavit that such new matter was not omitted from the original answer for the purpose of delay, the court committed no error in disallowing the proffered amendment. Gross v. Whitely, 128 Ga. 79 (57 S. E. 94).

Judgment affm-med.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carson v. Automobile Financing, Inc.
99 S.E.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Young v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
158 S.E. 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Archer & Cosper v. Arnold-Henegar-Doyle Co.
89 S.E. 1089 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 S.E. 215, 131 Ga. 713, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-rabun-ga-1908.