Nance v. Stockburger
36 S.E. 100, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 755
Opinion
Proof of weakness of mind not amounting to imbecility is not sufficient to warrant a jury in setting aside a contract, there being no proof of fraud or undue influence. Maddox v. Simmons, 31 Ga. 512; Richardson v. Adams, 110 Ga. 425.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nance v. Stockburger, 36 S.E. 100, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 755 (Ga. 1900).
36 S.E. 100 (Nance v. Stockburger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheppard v. Broome
107 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Jones v. Hogans
29 S.E.2d 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Higgins v. Trentham
197 S.E. 862 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
McElroy v. Lambert
192 S.E. 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Durrett v. McWhorter
129 S.E. 870 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Holland v. Hill
111 S.E. 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Brown v. Carmichael
101 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Bond v. First National Bank
92 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Johnson v. Coleman
68 S.E. 480 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
British & American Mortgage Co. v. Worrill
168 F. 120 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1909)
Slaughter v. Heath
57 S.E. 69 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Kirk v. Kirk
50 S.E. 928 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Barlow v. Strange
48 S.E. 344 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)