Kirk v. Kirk
50 S.E. 928, 123 Ga. 104, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 386
Opinion
The evidence showed mere weakness of the grantor’s mind, which is not cause for setting aside his deed (Nance v. Stockburger, 111 Ga. 821), and was wholly insufficient to authorize a finding that the grantee, by undue influence or fraudulent means, induced him to execute the deeds the 1 plaintiff sought to have canceled; nor was there any evidence that the defendant ever had the personalty for which the action was brought. It follows that the nonsuit was properly granted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirk v. Kirk, 50 S.E. 928, 123 Ga. 104, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 386 (Ga. 1905).
50 S.E. 928 (Kirk v. Kirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McElroy v. Lambert
192 S.E. 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)