Kirk v. Kirk

50 S.E. 928, 123 Ga. 104, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 386
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fish, P. J.

The evidence showed mere weakness of the grantor’s mind, which is not cause for setting aside his deed (Nance v. Stockburger, 111 Ga. 821), and was wholly insufficient to authorize a finding that the grantee, by undue influence or fraudulent means, induced him to execute the deeds the 1 plaintiff sought to have canceled; nor was there any evidence that the defendant ever had the personalty for which the action was brought. It follows that the nonsuit was properly granted.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirk v. Kirk, 50 S.E. 928, 123 Ga. 104, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 386 (Ga. 1905).

50 S.E. 928 (Kirk v. Kirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McElroy v. Lambert
192 S.E. 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)