Thompson v. Potter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1394

RUFUS E. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:03-cv-00593-JAB)

Submitted: September 25, 2006 Decided: October 16, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rufus E. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Rufus E. Thompson appeals the district court’s order

denying Thompson’s motion to vacate or set aside judgment pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Thompson v. Potter, No. 1:03-cv-00593-JAB

(M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 23, 2006; entered Feb. 24, 2006). We deny

Thompson’s motion to place his case in abeyance. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -