Thompson v. Potter

Fourth Circuit

Thompson v. Potter

203 F. App'x 501

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2006·No. No. 06-1394·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rufus E. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying Thompson’s motion to vacate or set aside judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Potter, No. 1:03-cv-00593-JAB (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 23, 2006; entered Feb. 24, 2006). We deny Thompson’s motion to place his case in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rufus E. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying Thompson’s motion to vacate or set aside judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Potter, No. 1:03-cv-00593-JAB (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 23, 2006; entered Feb. 24, 2006). We deny Thompson’s motion to place his case in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thompson v. Potter, 203 F. App'x 501 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

203 F. App'x 501 (Thompson v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.