Thompson v. Olinn

Ohio Supreme Court

Thompson v. Olinn

89 Ohio St. 3d 94

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 7, 2000·No. No. 99-2113·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The motion for reconsideration is granted.

[95] The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for reconsideration is granted.

[95] The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Thompson v. Olinn, 89 Ohio St. 3d 94 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

89 Ohio St. 3d 94 (Thompson v. Olinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related