Thompson v. Olinn

Ohio Supreme Court

Thompson v. Olinn

2000 Ohio 443, 89 Ohio St. 3d 94

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 2000

Docket1999-2113

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 443 (Thompson v. Olinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Olinn, 2000 Ohio 443, 89 Ohio St. 3d 94 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 94.]

THOMPSON, A MINOR, ET AL., APPELLEES, v. OLINN, A MINOR, ET AL.; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Thompson v. Olinn, 2000-Ohio-443.] Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe. (No. 99-2113—Submitted April 25, 2000—Decided June 7, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1585. __________________ Colley, Shroyer & Abraham Co., L.P.A., David I. Shroyer and David K. Frank, for appellees. Crabbe, Brown, Jones, Potts & Schmidt, Daniel J. Hurley and Steven E. Miller, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted. {¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

DOUGLAS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 4} I would grant the motion for reconsideration and allow the discretionary appeal. I would then set a briefing schedule and assign the case for oral argument. I would not, at this juncture, remand the cause to the trial court. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 94.]

THOMPSON, A MINOR, ET AL., APPELLEES, v. OLINN, A MINOR, ET AL.; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Thompson v. Olinn, 2000-Ohio-443.] Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe. (No. 99-2113—Submitted April 25, 2000—Decided June 7, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1585. __________________ Colley, Shroyer & Abraham Co., L.P.A., David I. Shroyer and David K. Frank, for appellees. Crabbe, Brown, Jones, Potts & Schmidt, Daniel J. Hurley and Steven E. Miller, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted. {¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

DOUGLAS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 4} I would grant the motion for reconsideration and allow the discretionary appeal. I would then set a briefing schedule and assign the case for oral argument. I would not, at this juncture, remand the cause to the trial court. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 443, 89 Ohio St. 3d 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-olinn-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack