Thompson v. Inman

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided July 6, 2023·No. 6:22-cv-01665·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RANDY THOMPSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:22-cv-01665-MK

v. ORDER WALKER P. INMAN, III, Defendant.

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 40), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 40) is adopted in full. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 27) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 6th day of July, 2023.

/s/ Michael J. McShane Michael McShane United States District Judge

1 -ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Inman, (D. Or. 2023).

Thompson v. Inman (Thompson v. Inman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related