Thompson v. Inman

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RANDY THOMPSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:21-cv-01231-MK

v. ORDER WALKER PATTERSON INMAN IIL, Defendant.

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 34), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). [review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 34) is adopted in full. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motions (ECF Nos. 6, 8, 20, 32, & 33) are DENIED as moot. The case is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of December, 2022.

1 -ORDER

____s_/M__i_c_h_a_el_ J_._ M__c_S_h_a_n_e________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

2 –ORDER