Thompson v. County of Erie
460 N.E.2d 223, 61 N.Y.2d 648, 472 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3608
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On the record before us, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein.
[650] Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. County of Erie, 460 N.E.2d 223, 61 N.Y.2d 648, 472 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3608 (N.Y. 1983).
460 N.E.2d 223 (Thompson v. County of Erie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kwiatek v. Buffalo Truck Sales & Service
178 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
O'Connell v. Pizza Time of New York, Inc.
176 A.D.2d 1233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)