O'Connell v. Pizza Time of New York, Inc.

176 A.D.2d 1233, 578 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13941

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted summary judgment to defendant, and properly denied plaintiffs’ request for an extension of time within which to serve their bill of particulars, based on plaintiffs’ unexcused failure to comply with the conditions of the prior, self-executing order of preclusion (see, Ervolina v City of Buffalo, 124 AD2d 998; Thompson v County of Erie [appeal No. 1], 91 AD2d 850, affd 61 NY2d 648). Plaintiffs’ alternative request for leave to commence a new action pursuant to CPLR 205 (a) was properly denied. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connell v. Pizza Time of New York, Inc., 176 A.D.2d 1233, 578 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 1233 (O'Connell v. Pizza Time of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. County of Erie
460 N.E.2d 223 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Thompson v. County of Erie
91 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Ervolina v. City of Buffalo
124 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)