Thompson v. Brown

1914 OK 662, 145 P. 343, 45 Okla. 139, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 250
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 22, 1914·No. 6598·Published

Opinion

BLEAKMORE, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Stephens county. The parties appear here as in the court below.

*140 On September 15, 1913, judgment was rendered dismissing the cause for want of prosecution. On-December 6, 1913, plaintiff moved the court to vacate said judgment and reinstate the action,, which motion was on January 6, 1914, overruled.

The proceeding is here upon a purported transcript of the record. The assignments of error go only to the action of the trial court in overruling the motion to vacate the judgment dismissing the cause. Defendant in error moves to dismiss this proceeding for the reason that the record presents no error the subject of review. The ruling of a trial court upon motion cannot be reviewed here, unless made a part of the record by bill of exceptions or case-made. Putnam et al. v. Western Bank Supply Co., 38 Okla. 152, 132 Pac. 483; Cable v. Myers, 43 Okla. 302, 142 Pac. 1114.

The case is therefore dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except KANE, C. J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Brown, 1914 OK 662, 145 P. 343, 45 Okla. 139, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 250 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 662 (Thompson v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putnam v. Western Bank Supply Co.
1913 OK 312 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Cable v. Myers
1914 OK 400 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)