Putnam v. Western Bank Supply Co.
This text of 1913 OK 312 (Putnam v. Western Bank Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case presents error from the superior court of Oklahoma county. The proceeding is here upon a transcript of the record. The only assignment of error contained in the petition in error is that: “Said court erred in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered by plaintiff in said action.” A motion to dismiss has been filed by counsel for defendant in error, on the ground that the record before us presents no error subject to review. This motion must be sustained. The motion to vacate the default judgment is no part of the record, and cannot be brought to this court by a transcript. McMecham v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301, 41 Pac. 382; Tribal Development Co. et al. v. White Bros. et al., 28 Okla. 525, 114 Pac. 736, and cases there cited. The cause is accordingly dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1913 OK 312, 132 P. 483, 38 Okla. 152, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putnam-v-western-bank-supply-co-okla-1913.