Thomman's Estate
29 A. 84, 161 Pa. 444, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 713
Opinion
The questions intended to be raised by this appeal were rightly decided by the learned auditor; and for reasons given in his report we think the decree complained of should be affirmed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomman's Estate, 29 A. 84, 161 Pa. 444, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 713 (Pa. 1894).
29 A. 84 (Thomman's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rickenbach Estate
34 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Witty v. . Witty
114 S.E. 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Schlater v. Lee
78 So. 700 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)
Atchison v. Francis
182 Iowa 37 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Emery v. Cooley
76 A. 529 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1910)
Long's Estate
39 Pa. Super. 323 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Beaver v. Ross
118 N.W. 287 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1908)
Nelson v. Nelson
75 N.E. 679 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
In re Estate of Klotz
42 A. 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)