Thomas v. Tibbals

2012 Ohio 1904
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 20, 2012
Docket11CA119
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 Ohio 1904 (Thomas v. Tibbals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Tibbals, 2012 Ohio 1904 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[Cite as Thomas v. Tibbals, 2012-Ohio-1904.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

GARY THOMAS : JUDGES: : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Petitioner : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. -vs- : : CASE NO. 11CA119 TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN : : : OPINION Respondent :

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: April 20, 2012

APPEARANCES:

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

Gary Thomas-A-601-988 No Appearance Mansfield Correctional Camp 1150 N. Main Street Mansfield, Ohio 44901 Richland County, Case No. 11CA119 1

Delaney, P.J.

{¶1} Petitioner, Gary Thomas, has filed an “Original Action in Habeas Corpus”

as well as a Motion for Default Judgment. Petitioner alleges a writ of habeas

corpus should be granted to release Petitioner from prison because Petitioner

has not received proper jail time credit.

{¶2} According to the petition, Petitioner was sentenced to a term of

incarceration in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case Number CR 08-507478.

The conviction in that case was overturned by the Eighth District Court of

Appeals. Petitioner was subsequently indicted in Cuyahoga County Common

Pleas Case Number CR 10-545714. It is Petitioner’s position he should be

released because he should have been given jail time credit in Case Number 10-

545714 for the time served in Case Number 08-507478.

{¶3} The Supreme Court has held habeas corpus does not lie to challenge jail

time credit, “[Petitioner] had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise any error by

the trial court in calculating his jail-time credit. State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton,

119 Ohio St.3d 350, 2008-Ohio-4476, 894 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 3.” Hughley v.

Saunders, 123 Ohio St.3d 446, 2009-Ohio-5585, 917 N.E.2d 270, ¶ I. Richland County, Case No. 11CA119 2

{¶4} Because habeas corpus does not lie to challenge the trial court’s

failure to grant jail time credit, the petition is dismissed for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted.

By: Delaney, P.J. Farmer, J. and Wise, J. concur

____________________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

____________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER

____________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

GARY THOMAS : CASE NO. 11CA119 : Petitioner : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN : : : Respondent :

For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, this

cause is dismissed.

Costs taxed to Petitioner.

______________________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

______________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER

______________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughley v. Saunders
2009 Ohio 5585 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton
894 N.E.2d 49 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 1904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-tibbals-ohioctapp-2012.