Thomas v. Tibbals
This text of 2012 Ohio 1904 (Thomas v. Tibbals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Thomas v. Tibbals, 2012-Ohio-1904.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
GARY THOMAS : JUDGES: : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Petitioner : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. : Hon. John W. Wise, J. -vs- : : CASE NO. 11CA119 TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN : : : OPINION Respondent :
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus
JUDGMENT: Dismissed
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: April 20, 2012
APPEARANCES:
For Petitioner: For Respondent:
Gary Thomas-A-601-988 No Appearance Mansfield Correctional Camp 1150 N. Main Street Mansfield, Ohio 44901 Richland County, Case No. 11CA119 1
Delaney, P.J.
{¶1} Petitioner, Gary Thomas, has filed an “Original Action in Habeas Corpus”
as well as a Motion for Default Judgment. Petitioner alleges a writ of habeas
corpus should be granted to release Petitioner from prison because Petitioner
has not received proper jail time credit.
{¶2} According to the petition, Petitioner was sentenced to a term of
incarceration in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case Number CR 08-507478.
The conviction in that case was overturned by the Eighth District Court of
Appeals. Petitioner was subsequently indicted in Cuyahoga County Common
Pleas Case Number CR 10-545714. It is Petitioner’s position he should be
released because he should have been given jail time credit in Case Number 10-
545714 for the time served in Case Number 08-507478.
{¶3} The Supreme Court has held habeas corpus does not lie to challenge jail
time credit, “[Petitioner] had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise any error by
the trial court in calculating his jail-time credit. State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton,
119 Ohio St.3d 350, 2008-Ohio-4476, 894 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 3.” Hughley v.
Saunders, 123 Ohio St.3d 446, 2009-Ohio-5585, 917 N.E.2d 270, ¶ I. Richland County, Case No. 11CA119 2
{¶4} Because habeas corpus does not lie to challenge the trial court’s
failure to grant jail time credit, the petition is dismissed for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted.
By: Delaney, P.J. Farmer, J. and Wise, J. concur
____________________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
____________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
____________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
GARY THOMAS : CASE NO. 11CA119 : Petitioner : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN : : : Respondent :
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, this
cause is dismissed.
Costs taxed to Petitioner.
______________________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
______________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
______________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 1904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-tibbals-ohioctapp-2012.