State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton
This text of 894 N.E.2d 49 (State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a judge to award jail-time credit. Because the petition does not state a viable mandamus claim, we affirm.
{¶ 2} Appellant, Tyrone Rudolph, a prison inmate, filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Timothy Horton, to grant him jail-time credit on his previously entered sentence. Judge Horton filed a motion to dismiss. The court of appeals granted the motion and dismissed Rudolph’s petition.
{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Rudolph had an adequate remedy at law by appeal to raise any error by the trial court in calculating his jail-time credit. State ex rel. Brown v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 99 Ohio St.3d 409, 2003-Ohio-4126, 792 N.E.2d 1123, ¶ 4. And insofar as Rudolph now claims that he is entitled to be released from prison because of his jail-time credit, habeas corpus, instead of mandamus, is the appropriate remedy. State ex rel. Gordon v. Murphy, 112 Ohio St.3d 329, 2006-Ohio-6572, 859 N.E.2d 928, ¶ 5.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
894 N.E.2d 49, 119 Ohio St. 3d 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rudolph-v-horton-ohio-2008.