Thomas v. Thomas

101 P. 865, 53 Wash. 297, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1316
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMay 27, 1909
DocketNo. 8075
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 101 P. 865 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Thomas, 101 P. 865, 53 Wash. 297, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1316 (Wash. 1909).

Opinion

Dunbar, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for divorce, the only contention being that the former husband of the respondent, plaintiff in this action, was not dead at the time of the alleged marriage of appellant and respondent. The testimony is brief and presents a plain conflict. The rule of presumption in cases of this kind is thus expressed in 1 Bishop, Marriage & Divorce (5th ed.), § 457:

“It being for the highest good of the parties, of the children, and of the community, that all intercourse between the sexes in its nature matrimonial should be such in fact, the law, when administered by enlightened judges, seizes upon all presumptions both of law and of fact, presses into its service all things which can help it in each particular case, to sustain marriage and repel the conclusion of unlawful commerce.”

Aided by this presumption, we think the court was justified in holding that the marriage was a legal one, and in rendering the decree which it did enter. Affirmed.

Rudkin, C. J., Mount, Crow, and Parker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KANG v. COMMISSIONER
2001 T.C. Summary Opinion 97 (U.S. Tax Court, 2001)
Davis v. Davis
122 P.2d 497 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Donofrio v. Donofrio
8 P.2d 966 (Washington Supreme Court, 1932)
In re the Application of Conklin
234 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
State Ex Rel. Bentley v. Frenger
291 P. 1089 (Washington Supreme Court, 1930)
Meton v. Industrial Insurance Department
177 P. 696 (Washington Supreme Court, 1919)
Carroll v. Huston
139 P. 458 (Montana Supreme Court, 1914)
In re Grande's Estate
141 N.Y.S. 535 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1913)
In re the Application for Letters of Administration de Bonis Non on the Goods, Chattels & Credits of Meehan
150 A.D. 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
In re Meehan's Estate
135 N.Y.S. 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Weatherall v. Weatherall
105 P. 822 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 P. 865, 53 Wash. 297, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-wash-1909.