Thomas v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 448

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 Tex. Crim. 331 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 1961·No. No. 32,824·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.

The record sustains appellants’ contention that there was no service of citation upon either of them, for which reason the default judgment making final the forfeiture of the appearance bond upon which they are sureties is without support.

The state agrees and does not seek affirmance.

The judgment making the judgment nisi final is reserved and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.

The state agrees and does not seek affirmance.

The judgment making the judgment nisi final is reserved and the cause remanded.

Thomas v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 448 (Tex. 1961).

Pincite

170 Tex. Crim. 448 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.